Freescale Semiconductor SOCs

For all your Raspberry Pi's, BeagleBoard's, Parallella's, ORDROID'S, TV boxes et al.
User avatar
Dirk Broer
Corsair
Corsair
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:24 pm
Location: Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Contact:

#1 Freescale Semiconductor SOCs

Post by Dirk Broer »

Freescale Semiconductor, as Wikipedia has it, was an American multinational corporation headquartered in Austin, Texas. Was, because it is now NXP Semiconductors. But as that name does not ring any bells yet, I will write this about the old name: Freescale. That is not the same 'free' as in 'free beer', as you will discover.

Though they produced various kinds of silicon chips, the ones we are interested in is the i.MX family. And it only really becomes interesting once they produce these as quad-cores, so if you will forgive me I wont even be writing about their mono and dual-core ARM Cortex-A7 based i.MX 7 series here, nope. We go straight to the quad models of the i.MX 6 series and later.

Freescale Semiconductor SOCs
ImageTypeFabCPU SpeedGPUGPU SpeedGPU SDKsApplications
i.MX6 QuadQuad-core Cortex-A940 nm1200 MHzVivante GC2000+ Vivante GC320+ Vivante GC355594 MHzOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Direct3D 11CuBox-i4, HummingBoard-i4, Udoo-i4
i.MX6 QuadPlusQuad-core Cortex-A940 nm1200 MHzVivante GC2000+ Vivante GC320+ Vivante GC355720 MHzOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Direct3D 11
i.MX8 QuadQuad-core Cortex-A5328 nm1500 MHzDual-core Vivante GC7000Lite/XSVX-OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Direct3D 11CuBox Pulse, HummingBoard Pulse
i.MX8 QuadPlusOne Cortex-A72 + Quad-core Cortex-A5328 nm1200 MHz + 1800 MHzDual-core Vivante GC7000Lite/XSVX-OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Direct3D 11-
i.MX8 QuadMaxTwo Cortex-A72 + Quad-core Cortex-A5328 nm1200 MHz + 1800 MHzDual-core Vivante GC7000/XSVX800 MHzOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Direct3D 11-
Somehow Freescale must have thought they'd struck gold with their SOCs, because they -and their resellers, e.g. SolidRun and Udoo- sold them at prices that put them almost out of business. It was economically far more interesting to invest in e.g. Intel Bay Trail or AMD Kabini -or later- SOCs, because the value for money on these was far higher -the costs were about the same, if not lower. And the AMD and Intel GPUs could be brought to use, BOINC-wise, as they were at least supported in BOINC with OpenCL capable drivers.

For those who do not believe a Freescale system is expensive:
compose your own HummingBoard Quad
Compose your own CuBox Quad
Buy a Udoo Quad
Image
User avatar
scole of TSBT
Boinc Major General
Boinc Major General
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:38 pm
Location: Goldsboro, (Eastern) North Carolina, USA

#2 Re: Freescale Semiconductor SOCs

Post by scole of TSBT »

All the ARM CPU manufacturers are going to have to produce/release 14 nm or less tech else it just won't have that power efficiency advantage to compete compared to the latest Intel CPUs.
Image
User avatar
Dirk Broer
Corsair
Corsair
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:24 pm
Location: Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Contact:

#3 Re: Freescale Semiconductor SOCs

Post by Dirk Broer »

scole of TSBT wrote: Fri May 25, 2018 4:03 amAll the ARM CPU manufacturers are going to have to produce/release 14 nm or less tech else it just won't have that power efficiency advantage to compete compared to the latest Intel CPUs.
I know of at least one company that will manufacture a 14 nm ARM SOC: The Intel Stratix-10, a Cortex-A53 that is made by Intel for Altera Image
Other examples of 14 nm ARM chips are the Exynos 8 Octa and Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820
Next step has been set by Intel too: a 10 nm step
A 7 nm step by MediaTek is in the making (and it looks like the core wars are invading the ARM platform too)
Image
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Single-board Computers”