GPU Crunching on a budget: nVidia
- Dirk Broer
- Corsair
- Posts: 1962
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:24 pm
- Location: Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
- Contact:
#11 Re: GPU Crunching on a budget: nVidia
I have now included Cuda version, GPU speed, RAM speed, RAM bandwidth and SM count, but my guess is that the number of CUDA cores and the SM count (and the CUDA version) is more important than the speeds or the bandwidth. For those of use -like me- who still use a GTX 650: swith to a GTX 1650 or a GTX 1650 Ti (or the GTX 1660 Ti, which is even better, credit-wise).
- Dirk Broer
- Corsair
- Posts: 1962
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:24 pm
- Location: Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
- Contact:
#12 Re: GPU Crunching on a budget: nVidia
So, here I present the budget plus table:scole of TSBT wrote: ↑Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:20 am Just a note though. If you plan to run more than one GTX 1050 / 1050 ti, you get more GFLOPs/watt and more GFLOPs/$ from a single GTX 1060 than two GTX 1050 /1050 ti. The GFLOPs/watt goes up as the GPU model goes up.
Tesla, Fermi, Kepler, Maxwell, Pascal, Turing and Ampère chips compared for the 'budget plus card' segment:
Model | Video Chip | CUDA version | Video Speed MHz | RAM speed MHz | RAM bandwidth GB/s | CUDA cores | SM/CU count | GFLOP SP | GFLOP DP | TDP in Watt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX 260 | GT 200 | 1.3 | 576 | 1998 | 111.9 | 192 | 24 | 476.9 | 59.62 | 182 |
GTX 260 Core 216 | GT 200 | 1.3 | 576 | 1998 | 111.9 | 216 | 27 | 536.5 | 67.07 | 182 |
GTX 460 | GF 104 | 2.1 | 675 | 3600 | 115.2 | 336 | 7 | 907.2 | 75.60 | 160 |
GTX 560 | GF 114 | 2.1 | 810 | 4000 | 128.0 | 336 | 7 | 1089.0 | 90.72 | 150 |
GTX 560 Ti | GF 114 | 2.1 | 823 | 4008 | 128.3 | 384 | 8 | 1263.0 | 105.30 | 170 |
GTX 660 | GK 106 | 3.0 | 1032 | 6008 | 144.2 | 960 | 5 | 1981.0 | 82.56 | 140 |
GTX 660 Ti | GK 104 | 3.0 | 980 | 6008 | 144.2 | 1344 | 7 | 2634.0 | 109.80 | 150 |
GTX 760 | GK 104 | 3.0 | 1032 | 6008 | 192.3 | 1152 | 6 | 2378.0 | 99.07 | 170 |
GTX 760 Ti | GK 104 | 3.0 | 980 | 6008 | 192.3 | 1344 | 7 | 2634.0 | 109.80 | 170 |
GTX 960 | GM 206 | 5.2 | 1178 | 7012 | 112.2 | 1024 | 8 | 2413.0 | 75.39 | 120 |
GTX 1060 3GB | GP 106 | 6.1 | 1708 | 8008 | 192.2 | 1152 | 9 | 3935.0 | 123.00 | 120 |
GTX 1060 6GB | GP 104 | 6.1 | 1709 | 8008 | 192.2 | 1280 | 10 | 4275.0 | 136.70 | 120 |
RTX 2060 | TU 106 | 7.5 | 1680 | 14008 | 336.0 | 1920 | 30 | 6451.0 | 201.60 | 160 |
RTX 2060 Super | TU 106 | 7.5 | 1650 | 14000 | 448.0 | 2176 | 34 | 7181.0 | 224.40 | 160 |
GTX 1660 | TU 116 | 7.5 | 1785 | 8004 | 192.1 | 1408 | 22 | 5027.0 | 157.10 | 120 |
GTX 1660 Super | TU 116 | 7.5 | 1785 | 14000 | 336.0 | 1408 | 22 | 5027.0 | 157.10 | 125 |
GTX 1660 Ti | TU 116 | 7.5 | 1770 | 12000 | 288.0 | 1536 | 24 | 5437.0 | 169.90 | 120 |
RTX 3060 | GA 106 | 8.5 | 1860 | 14000 | 336.0 | 3840 | 30 | 14280.0 | 223.20 | 180 |