Benchmarks

Forum rules
davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#1 Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:28 pm

:geek:
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
Image

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#2 gtx1660ti under Linux: 480K/day

Post by davidBAM » Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:23 pm

Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
16426.31 16394.50 91,500481,277154,255New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16388.66 16354.86 91,500482,382154,610New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16371.78 16332.12 91,500482,880154,769New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16353.91 16315.69 91,500483,407154,938New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16382.73 16290.88 91,500482,557154,666New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16398.74 16287.03 91,500482,086154,515New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16370.79 16252.09 91,500482,909154,778New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16387.51 16349.14 91,500482,416154,621New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16363.72 16336.30 91,500483,118154,845New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16338.39 16249.04 91,500483,867155,085New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16312.19 16237.50 91,500484,644155,335New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16361.49 16254.05 91,500483,183154,866New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16349.57 16285.28 91,500483,536154,979New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16354.08 16279.60 91,500483,402154,937New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16348.98 16273.54 91,500483,553154,985New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16370.28 16301.22 91,500482,924154,783New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16352.88 16237.23 91,500483,438154,948New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16312.29 16267.50 91,500484,641155,334New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16311.56 16207.49 91,500484,662155,341New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16367.75 16105.82 91,500482,999154,807New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
16,361.1816,280.5491,500483,194154,870Averages for nVidia GTX1660 Ti, 130W, 1 WU per proc
22-Feb-20
Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
3150.85 3135.47 16,728458,691147,016New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4110.74 4098.59 24,548515,942165,366New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2430.69 2423.92 12,083429,478137,653New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1990.19 1984.34 11,559501,827160,842New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3692.93 3674.62 21,454501,933160,876New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1861.49 1853.70 10,800501,276160,665New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4836.60 4819.24 27,488491,044157,386New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3978.38 3965.60 23,941519,926166,643New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2589.92 2577.39 11,638388,230124,433New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2649.10 2636.46 13,638444,795142,563New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4103.92 4093.33 23,846502,032160,908New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2346.30 2335.52 13,861510,400163,590New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
5303.39 5283.18 29,395478,890153,490New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2220.61 2210.48 12,962504,316161,640New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2278.73 2269.14 8,391318,166101,976New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2676.19 2662.28 14,479467,442149,821New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3683.41 3669.97 20,458479,863153,802New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2549.42 2541.41 9,014305,46897,906New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2177.08 2169.58 12,315488,750156,651New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2808.83 2793.35 16,713514,094164,774New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3,071.943,059.8816,765466,128149,400Averages for nVidia GTX1660 Ti, 130W, 1 WU per proc
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
Image

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#3 gtx1660ti power-limited on Linux

Post by davidBAM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:06 pm

These results were an aberration from the project & will not be reproducable. Pity

NOTE : new cuda100 with full Turing support. Takes a full CPU thread on a 2990WX
Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
8880.71 8880.71 496,9914,835,2041,721,939New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4921.85 4921.85 207,7993,647,7771,299,066New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3123.01 3114.08 120,9383,345,8111,191,528New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4939.49 4927.49 260,4714,556,0811,622,536New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4361.53 4347.75 177,5253,516,6931,252,383New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2650.12 2630.10 101,8583,320,7881,182,617New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4830.41 4830.41 254,6894,555,5361,622,342New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3851.99 3849.45 157,0843,523,3831,254,766New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3062.35 3060.75 113,2093,194,0291,137,475New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3715.54 3715.54 193,0734,489,6471,598,877New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
5053.90 5053.90 265,0054,530,4481,613,407New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3506.12 3493.07 140,6813,466,7551,234,599New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4599.17 4594.15 168,3683,162,9521,126,407New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3243.26 3230.65 121,3653,233,1471,151,406New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
9707.56 9707.56 511,8414,555,5301,622,340New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2579.58 2566.21 96,4133,229,2231,150,008New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4702.97 4692.61 248,3554,562,6211,624,865New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4118.94 4118.94 170,3363,573,0191,272,443New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
6380.31 6380.31 319,8714,331,5881,542,588New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
7017.64 7017.64 375,9864,629,0791,648,533New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4,762.324,756.66225,0933,912,9661,393,506Averages for nVidia GTX1660 Ti, 117W, 1 WU per proc

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#4 nVidia RTX2070 Super undervolted on Linux

Post by davidBAM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:28 pm

These results were an aberration from the project & will not be reproducable. Pity
no better than 1660ti for more electricity (and money)
Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
3921.61 3921.61 221,7604,885,7651,100,397New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2931.95 2929.60 105,1433,098,386697,835New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4152.05 4152.05 243,1135,058,9281,139,398New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4530.54 4518.17 284,6145,427,7481,222,466New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4047.19 4040.04 118,3392,526,313568,989New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
5376.10 5368.68 167,9632,699,347607,961New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4045.39 4045.39 178,7293,817,225859,735New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3855.55 3855.55 208,6544,675,7751,053,102New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3977.40 3977.40 114,9982,498,060562,626New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3619.80 3616.26 151,8193,623,720816,153New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4283.55 4283.55 251,6515,075,8531,143,210New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3305.86 3305.86 134,6743,519,753792,737New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4435.16 4435.16 266,3215,188,1231,168,496New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4,037.094,034.56188,2904,007,307902,547Averages for nVidia RTX2070 super undervolt, 185W, 1 WU per proc

SolidAir79
Boinc Sergeant
Boinc Sergeant
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:28 pm
Location: Scotland, Angus

#5 2080 oc

Post by SolidAir79 » Sat Feb 22, 2020 12:39 pm

Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
1775.13 1760.70 18,962922,922183,119New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
2283.23 2273.13 25,050947,935188,082New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1274.45 1268.91 11,842802,799159,286New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1064.72 1057.06 9,124740,420146,909New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1526.22 1520.39 15,586882,348175,069New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1763.28 1752.77 18,384900,818178,734New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1293.22 1286.64 12,401828,540164,393New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
2066.62 2053.63 21,606903,275179,221New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1464.80 1454.06 14,893878,436174,293New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
3186.56 3173.42 36,363985,952195,625New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1156.70 1145.72 6,989522,050103,581New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1312.82 1299.05 9,474623,520123,714New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
2580.92 2570.39 29,395984,044195,247New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
3499.65 3486.30 41,0471,013,370201,065New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1321.82 1304.42 13,035852,050169,058New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1422.08 1408.03 14,354872,119173,040New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1113.85 1103.88 9,858764,703151,727New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1626.11 1618.70 16,841894,795177,539New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1511.01 1498.88 15,321876,048173,819New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1138.04 1122.55 10,025761,089151,010New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101)
1,719.061,707.9317,528847,862168,227Averages for nVidia RTX2080 OC GPU, 210W, 1 WU per proc
The universe is both go and ju.

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#6 Re: Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sat Feb 22, 2020 12:42 pm

cuda101, eh !!!!

will try a 2070 Super again as I think it only got cuda100 last time

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#7 Re: Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sat Feb 22, 2020 12:53 pm

yeah - still cuda100. That makes sense as I seem to remember that the Supers might just be reject chips with faulty RT hardware. Dunno if that is true or not

SolidAir79
Boinc Sergeant
Boinc Sergeant
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:28 pm
Location: Scotland, Angus

#8 Re: Benchmarks

Post by SolidAir79 » Sat Feb 22, 2020 1:52 pm

Your right same die as the 2080 but disabled cores so probably ones that never made the grade, makes good business sense
The universe is both go and ju.

SolidAir79
Boinc Sergeant
Boinc Sergeant
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:28 pm
Location: Scotland, Angus

#9 Re: Benchmarks

Post by SolidAir79 » Sat Feb 22, 2020 1:57 pm

Although I don't think the Rtx cores are completely disabled just cut down

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#10 Re: Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sat Feb 22, 2020 3:08 pm

first few results would suggest around 725K ppd for 2070 super but I'll wait until I get a full page of 20 new results. Very respectable if correct

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#11 2070 Super on Linux

Post by davidBAM » Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:24 am

Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
1722.70 1715.94 15,250764,843151,755New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1557.39 1555.06 13,322739,053146,638New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2411.46 2410.15 23,165829,993164,681New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2286.54 2281.28 18,738708,041140,484New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4081.00 4080.46 30,641648,711128,712New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1897.02 1894.35 17,089778,309154,426New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1360.37 1358.85 7,001444,64188,222New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1040.84 1031.56 5,473454,32490,144New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4297.81 4294.33 33,380671,044133,144New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1459.16 1448.08 8,935529,079104,976New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1323.87 1322.13 7,786508,148100,823New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2355.44 2350.67 22,297817,875162,277New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1398.60 1388.62 12,092746,965148,207New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2252.40 2251.42 18,122695,146137,926New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2264.64 2261.40 18,955723,150143,482New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1680.70 1679.21 14,673754,287149,660New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1531.40 1527.43 12,788721,479143,151New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1586.80 1577.07 13,886756,106150,021New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
982.69 972.04 5,204457,51890,777New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2219.00 2211.85 17,693688,898136,686New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1,985.491,980.6015,824671,880133,310Averages for rtx2070super, 210W, 1 WU per proc

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#12 Re: Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:25 am

Lower than I expected but three WU in the 450K ppd have really dragged down the average. Might try a larger sample sometime

User avatar
Granowski
Morale Officer
Morale Officer
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 3:35 pm
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Contact:

#13 Re: Benchmarks

Post by Granowski » Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:48 am

greetings ... we are now at the fifth place in Formula Boinc ... let me asure of my continoius support and sincerely, Gregg Roman Granowski ...
Image

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4104
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#14 Re: Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:50 am

Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
1722.70 1715.94 15,250764,843148,225New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1557.39 1555.06 13,322739,053143,227New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2411.46 2410.15 23,165829,993160,851New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2286.54 2281.28 18,738708,041137,217New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4081.00 4080.46 30,641648,711125,719New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1897.02 1894.35 17,089778,309150,835New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1360.37 1358.85 7,001444,64186,171New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1040.84 1031.56 5,473454,32488,047New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4297.81 4294.33 33,380671,044130,047New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1459.16 1448.08 8,935529,079102,535New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1323.87 1322.13 7,786508,14898,478New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2355.44 2350.67 22,297817,875158,503New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1398.60 1388.62 12,092746,965144,761New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2252.40 2251.42 18,122695,146134,718New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2264.64 2261.40 18,955723,150140,145New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1680.70 1679.21 14,673754,287146,180New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1531.40 1527.43 12,788721,479139,821New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1586.80 1577.07 13,886756,106146,532New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2219.00 2211.85 17,693688,898133,507New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1327.09 1319.18 11,068720,601139,651New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2318.58 2310.78 22,101823,562159,605New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1822.72 1815.01 16,364775,666150,323New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1841.65 1834.71 16,817788,963152,900New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1321.76 1319.17 10,850709,240137,450New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1767.14 1765.30 15,758770,443149,311New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1574.80 1572.96 13,154721,686139,862New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
3543.85 3540.53 34,235834,669161,758New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1826.21 1824.96 15,952754,704146,260New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2268.25 2261.36 21,322812,160157,395New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1411.10 1408.42 11,798722,370139,994New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1773.17 1765.42 16,203789,503153,004New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1342.76 1339.05 11,285726,163140,729New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2250.80 2249.35 17,663677,999131,395New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1823.52 1815.09 16,700791,237153,341New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1668.76 1666.31 14,336742,269143,851New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1320.40 1309.23 7,701503,92597,660New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1573.57 1567.18 13,286729,477141,372New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
4343.64 4343.13 33,461665,587128,990New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
2586.26 2578.61 25,228842,804163,334New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
982.69 972.04 5,204457,51888,666New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda100)
1,985.401,980.4416,544708,516137,309Averages for rxt2070super, 215W, 1 WU per proc

User avatar
Granowski
Morale Officer
Morale Officer
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 3:35 pm
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Contact:

#15 Re: Benchmarks

Post by Granowski » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:33 pm

we are about 200 mln points to get next step in collatz towards Formula Boinc ... after it is going to be not easy to reach next place ... sincerely, Gregg Roman Granowski ...

ps. Dear Mr. Administrator, davidBAM ... i've added You, Sir ... as a friend in collatz ...

edit : I've passed 4.000.000.000 in collatz !

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “GPUGRID”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests