Do you need a core per gpu?

Using your nVidia or AMD Graphics card for BOINC computation.
User avatar
rowpie
Peon
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 11:26 pm

#1 Do you need a core per gpu?

Post by rowpie »

Right now i believe that when you use a graphics card you lose one cpu core to the crunching hence the using of old computers by you lot.

What if you were to build a system with 4 graphics cards and a cheep single core as a crunching box (no im not going to but i can dream)

would only one graphics card be able to run?

Just a thought.
User avatar
MacDitch
Moderator General
Moderator General
Posts: 1129
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Ex-Edinburgh

#2

Post by MacDitch »

Theoretically you can run one graphics card per thread/core/whatever. That said, as Megacruncher is finding, multiple cards can be iffy.

If you put 4 graphic cards with (say) a Pentium3, then three of them would be idle. Use a Quad or hyperthreaded P4 and all 4 may be utilised.

Clear as mud? :)
User avatar
rowpie
Peon
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 11:26 pm

#3

Post by rowpie »

so currently if you were to put 3 or 4 cards into a board you need a quad core cpu to run them (or a dual core with HT if they can be found)

seems like this boinc gpu adventure has a long way to go yet.
Temujin

#4

Post by Temujin »

seems like this boinc gpu adventure has a long way to go yet.
Possibly not according to this post by GDF of PS3Grid
Cpu cores will soon be not necessary.
User avatar
rowpie
Peon
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 11:26 pm

#5

Post by rowpie »

good news indeed by the looks of it.

would allow mega graphics cruncher with cheap cpu or even better a mega quad cpu which is also crunching lol
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)”