Benchmarks

Forum rules
davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4098
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#1 Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sat Mar 28, 2020 2:04 am

:geek:
I think this is fool-proof but could you just try it for me please? • There are 10 types of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those who don’t
Image

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4098
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#2 rtx2070super gpu72 on linux

Post by davidBAM » Sat Mar 28, 2020 2:41 am

Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
270.87 1.83 1,500478,458107,761GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
273.85 1.79 1,500473,252106,588GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.96 1.86 1,500474,795106,936GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.00 1.85 1,500476,471107,313GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
271.99 1.90 1,500476,488107,317GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.96 1.92 1,500474,795106,936GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
270.87 1.85 1,500478,458107,761GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
271.94 1.77 1,500476,576107,337GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.00 1.79 1,500476,471107,313GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
270.97 1.76 1,500478,282107,721GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.91 1.89 1,500474,882106,955GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.98 1.89 1,500474,760106,928GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
271.23 1.78 1,500477,823107,618GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
271.20 1.81 1,500477,876107,630GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.75 1.78 1,500475,160107,018GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
271.74 1.71 1,500476,926107,416GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
271.82 1.76 1,500476,786107,384GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
272.061.821,500476,368107,290Averages for nVidia RTX2070 super undervolt, 185W, 1 WU per proc

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4098
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#3 gtx1660ti gpu72 on linux

Post by davidBAM » Sat Mar 28, 2020 3:00 am

Run TimeCPU TimeCreditPer day/procCredit per kWHApplication
453.60 3.04 1,500285,71491,575GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
449.58 2.91 1,500288,26992,394GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
452.72 2.88 1,500286,27091,753GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
450.61 2.72 1,500287,61092,183GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
451.65 2.87 1,500286,94891,970GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
453.81 2.93 1,500285,58291,533GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
451.66 2.73 1,500286,94291,968GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
448.56 3.00 1,500288,92592,604GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
452.70 2.85 1,500286,28291,757GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
450.61 2.85 1,500287,61092,183GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
450.58 2.91 1,500287,62992,189GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
446.68 2.92 1,500290,14192,994GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
453.65 3.12 1,500285,68391,565GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
451.63 2.80 1,500286,96191,975GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
452.71 2.84 1,500286,27691,755GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
452.73 2.72 1,500286,26391,751GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
453.71 2.77 1,500285,64591,553GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
448.72 2.78 1,500288,82292,571GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
449.69 2.85 1,500288,19992,371GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
450.55 2.85 1,500287,64892,195GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
451.312.871,500287,17192,042Averages for nVidia GTX1660 Ti, 130W, 1 WU per proc

User avatar
Dirk Broer
Corsair
Corsair
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:24 pm
Location: Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Contact:

#4 Re: Benchmarks

Post by Dirk Broer » Sat Mar 28, 2020 10:51 am

I'll update my Ubuntu system with its GTX650 to see what it brings. Might replace it with a GT1030 soon, as it performs better (theoretically) and uses less power

Code: Select all

|         |   FP32  |   FP64  |  FP16  | Watt tdp|
|---------|---------|---------|--------|---------|
| GTX650  |   812.5 | 33.86   |   -    |    65   |
| GT1030  |  1127.0 | 35.23   | 17.62  |    30   |
BTW: this method for tables sucks
Image
Image

davidBAM
General Bitchin'
General Bitchin'
Posts: 4098
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:15 pm
Location: Huntly, Scotland
Contact:

#5 Re: Benchmarks

Post by davidBAM » Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:19 pm

disregard benchmarks above - WU are now longer and pay 3000 each

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “SRBase”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests